MemoryOS MCP Server
OfficialRelated Servers
Alternatives to MemoryOS MCP Server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI agents to access file systems, fetch web content, query databases, and execute shell commands through the standardized Model Context Protocol.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceGoverned shared memory platform for AI agents and agent fleets. Provides persistent memory, cross-agent knowledge sharing, permissions, audit trails, and multi-tenant isolation through a Model Context Protocol (MCP) server.4 npm501Apache 2.0
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI agents to access a local-first personal context and memory layer through MCP tools for bootstrapping user context, semantically searching Markdown vault knowledge, reading files, listing topics, and adding controlled memories. It provides deterministic context retrieval, provenance-cited vector search, and secure vault operations while keeping data local and model-independent.6MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI agents to access hybrid vector, reasoning-based tree retrieval, and agent memory through the Model Context Protocol (MCP), supporting Claude Desktop and other MCP-compatible clients.113 npmApache 2.0
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables secure, stateful AI agents and LLM tools to access enterprise databases, knowledge bases, live system metrics, and sandboxed code execution through the Model Context Protocol, with authentication, rate limiting, and safety guards.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables secure enterprise AI agents to access internal tools like GitHub, Gmail, Calendar, file systems, databases, and knowledge bases through the Model Context Protocol, with built-in security, audit, and observability.MIT
TDQS
Scored across 26 tools
Most tools target distinct resource-action pairs, and the tenant-scoped vs universal variants are marked in names and descriptions. A few pairs like memoryos_get_job_status vs memoryos_universal_get_job_status and memoryos_get_context vs memoryos_universal_get_context require careful reading, but overall selection should be unambiguous.
The memoryos_ prefix plus snake_case verb_noun naming is highly consistent across list/get/update/delete/set/register/create tools. The main deviations are memoryos_universal_* placing the scope modifier before the verb and memoryos_api_request being a noun-only exception.
At 26 tools the surface is above the 25-tool threshold and feels too heavy for a memory-focused MCP server, especially with support, billing, global-agent, and universal features bundled in. The tools are individually justified, but the set would benefit from consolidation or splitting into focused servers.
The core memory lifecycle is well covered: add, list, get, update, delete, history, context, job status, plus user export/stats/block. Minor gaps exist in universal/global-agent operations, such as no update/delete/list for universal or global agents, but the catch-all api_request and read-only coverage make these workable.