Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to rowsmith-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Generates realistic, referentially-coherent test data (SQL INSERTs, JSON, or CSV) from your database schema, resolving foreign keys and respecting constraints. Paste CREATE TABLE DDL or a JSON schema and get ready-to-run seed data with valid relationships.
      2
      17 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to query keyless mock REST data — products, users, posts, comments, recipes, quotes, and todos — with search, paging, and field selection for prototyping, demos, and test scaffolds. Offers a gateway-hosted or local stdio MCP endpoint plus plain-HTTP tool calls, requiring no API key or account for initial use.
      12 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to read realistic, coherent data—repos, pull requests, issues, commits, users—through API-compatible, read-only replicas of 21 developer platforms including GitHub, Jira, Linear, Slack, Sentry and Salesforce, all preloaded with one simulated company so integrations can be built and tested with no accounts, credentials, rate-limit worry, or cleanup.
      10
      266 npm
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4.1/5.0

    Scored across 5 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Each tool occupies a distinct stage of the workflow: introspection (list_column_types), valid data generation (generate_test_data), invalid-case generation (invalid_values), sandbox provisioning (sandbox_create), and payment operations (sandbox_payments). The only mild overlap is between generate_test_data and invalid_values, since both emit fabricated records, but the names and descriptions make the valid/invalid split clear. sandbox_payments bundles five actions (charge, refund, list, get, reset) into one tool, which is a slight boundary blur but not a cross-tool ambiguity.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    All names use snake_case, but the ordering convention is mixed: most tools lead with a verb (list_column_types, generate_test_data), while the sandbox pair leads with a noun (sandbox_create, sandbox_payments) and invalid_values has no verb at all. It remains readable, but the pattern is not predictable enough to guess a tool name from its action.

    Tool Count5/5

    Five tools is a tight, well-scoped surface for a test-data and payment-sandbox server, and each tool corresponds to a genuine step in the described workflow. Nothing feels padded or redundant.

    Completeness4/5

    The chain from schema inspection through data generation, invalid-value testing, sandbox creation, and payment simulation is essentially covered, including the documented 'next' hints. Minor gaps exist around sandbox lifecycle management (no explicit delete or list-sandboxes tool; cleanup is only implicit via the 1-hour expiry) and there is no standalone way to validate an arbitrary schema.