Skip to main content
Glama
meinzeug

MCP AI Bug Helper

by meinzeug
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to MCP AI Bug Helper

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • Ask MCP

      SerPepe
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Provides access to multiple AI models (Grok, Gemini 2.5 Pro, Kimi, Qwen3 Coder, GLM-4.5) through OpenRouter, enabling users to query different specialized models for reasoning, coding, translation, and general tasks with automatic fallback to free variants.
      3 npm
      MIT

    • Second Opinion MCP Server

      joewilsonai
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Provides AI-powered assistance for coding problems using Google's Gemini AI, combined with Perplexity insights and Stack Overflow references, facilitating contextual analysis and automatic response archiving for improved troubleshooting.
      15
      -

    • Ask-a-Friend

      mbettan
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI coding agents to request a second opinion from a different frontier model via a single tool call, with PII scrubbed before transit, live web search, and support for Claude, ChatGPT, Cursor, and Gemini.
      Apache 2.0

    • Deliberation

      antonbabenko
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Ask Codex, Gemini, Grok, and 400+ OpenRouter models (Qwen, Kimi, DeepSeek) for second opinions or arbiter-mediated consensus. One MCP server for Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, Kiro, OpenCode. Measures which models earn their seat.
      20
      163
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    B3.3/5.0

    Scored across 1 tool

    Disambiguation5/5

    With only one tool, there is no possibility of ambiguity or overlap between tools. The tool has a distinct purpose of querying coding specialists, so an agent cannot misselect between non-existent alternatives.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    A single tool inherently has perfect naming consistency, as there are no other tools to compare it against. The tool name 'ask-coding-advisors' follows a clear verb_noun pattern, but consistency cannot be assessed across a set of one.

    Tool Count2/5

    One tool is generally too few for a server's purpose, as it limits functionality and suggests an incomplete or trivial scope. For a bug helper server, a single tool is insufficient to cover typical operations like analyzing, fixing, or testing code, making it feel thin and under-scoped.

    Completeness2/5

    The server's purpose as a bug helper implies a need for tools to handle various aspects of debugging, but with only one tool for querying advisors, there are significant gaps. Missing operations like code analysis, error detection, or solution implementation make the surface severely incomplete for the domain.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources