Skip to main content
Glama
mehbul

uptime-kuma-mcp-server

by mehbul

Related Servers

Alternatives to uptime-kuma-mcp-server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables LLM clients to manage Uptime Kuma HTTP(S) monitors, groups, tags, and notifications, and to retrieve heartbeats, stats, and incident history through MCP tools.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables users to manage OmniWatchGuard website monitors and alerts via natural language. Supports listing, creating, updating, pausing, resuming, and deleting monitors, plus reviewing recent notifications across channels.
      221 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      MCP server for Uptime Kuma that enables monitoring and management of uptime monitors, heartbeats, notifications, tags, and maintenance windows via natural language.
      31
      1,129 npm
      49
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Connects AI assistants to IonHour uptime monitoring workspaces to manage projects, monitoring checks, and incident responses. It enables users to view reliability metrics, send heartbeats, and manage status pages through natural language.
      24 npm
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4.2/5.0

    Scored across 12 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct resource/action: monitors are separated into list/get/create/edit/delete/pause/resume, while health data is split into heartbeats, status, and metrics. Notifications and status pages are clearly separate read-only listing tools, so there is little risk of misselection.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tools follow the same uptime_kuma_ prefix with a consistent verb_noun structure in snake_case: list_monitors, get_monitor, create_monitor, edit_monitor, delete_monitor, pause_monitor, resume_monitor. The naming pattern is uniform and predictable.

    Tool Count5/5

    Twelve tools is well-scoped for an Uptime Kuma server, covering monitor lifecycle, operational controls, health data, notifications, status pages, and metrics. Each tool fills a distinct role with no obvious redundancy.

    Completeness4/5

    Monitor CRUD, pause/resume, heartbeats, uptime status, and metrics provide strong lifecycle coverage for core monitoring workflows. The main gap is that notifications and status pages only have list operations, with no create/update/delete tools, though this is workable for read-oriented usage.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues