resume_loop

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure. It states it 'removes the block' (implying a mutation) but does not mention side effects, persistence, required session state, or failure modes. The description is too sparse to inform an agent of the tool's full behavioral implications.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, concise sentence with no fluff, and it front-loads the core action. However, it is under-specified to the point of being terse, which slightly reduces its value for clarity.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The tool is a mutation with no annotations, no output schema, and only two parameters. The description does not cover essential context like side effects, prerequisites, return values, or error conditions. It is not complete enough for safe autonomous use.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 50% (only 'user_input' has a description). The tool description adds no additional meaning for either parameter, leaving 'session_id' completely unexplained. Given the low coverage and lack of supplementary description, the tool fails to compensate for the missing context.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly identifies the tool's action ('Removes the block and adds human input context') and resource ('the loop'), which distinguishes it from sibling tools like 'report_blocker' and 'init_loop'. However, it could be more specific about what 'the block' and 'human input context' refer to exactly.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as 'report_blocker' or 'init_loop'. The description does not mention any prerequisites, conditions, or exclusions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.