get_page
Fetch a page from a collective as markdown, returning metadata and body.
Instructions
Fetch a page as markdown. Returns the metadata block followed by the page body.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| collectiveId | Yes | ||
| pageId | Yes |
Fetch a page from a collective as markdown, returning metadata and body.
Fetch a page as markdown. Returns the metadata block followed by the page body.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| collectiveId | Yes | ||
| pageId | Yes |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations, the description must disclose read-only nature and behavioral traits. It states 'Fetch' implying read, but does not explicitly declare no side effects, authorization needs, rate limits, or error handling. The output format is described, which adds some transparency.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is very concise at two sentences with no wasted words. However, it could include brief parameter hints without harm, so it loses a point for being slightly under-informative.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the tool has 2 required parameters with no schema descriptions and no output schema, the description is incomplete. It does not cover parameter usage, error scenarios, or prerequisites, leaving the agent without essential context for reliable invocation.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 0%, and the description does not explain the parameters (collectiveId, pageId) at all. The agent must infer their meaning from the tool name alone, which is insufficient for proper usage.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the action is to fetch a page as markdown and specifies the output format (metadata block followed by body). This is a specific verb-resource combination that distinguishes it from siblings like create_page or delete_page.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives, no prerequisites, and no exclusions. The agent has no context for selection among similar fetch tools like get_backlinks.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/megamaced/nc_collectives-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server