Skip to main content
Glama

Server Configuration

Describes the environment variables required to run the server.

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Instructions

Guidance the server publishes about itself, which clients place ahead of the tool catalog so the model reads it before choosing anything.

This server publishes no instructions, or was last inspected before Glama recorded them.

Capabilities

Features and capabilities supported by this server

Protocol revision2025-11-25

CapabilityDetails
tools
{
  "listChanged": true
}

Tools

Functions exposed to the LLM to take actions

NameDescription
soma_verify_codeA

Run candidate code against tests inside an isolated sandbox and return a PASS/FAIL verdict with a signed, offline-checkable certificate (Ed25519). Use this to independently confirm that code actually works before trusting it.

Two test shapes:

  • function mode (default): tests = [{"input": [arg1, arg2], "expected": value}] and provide 'entrypoint' (the function name).

  • stdio mode: set mode='stdio' and tests = [{"stdin": "...", "expected_stdout": "..."}]; no entrypoint needed.

Supported languages include python, javascript, typescript, go, c, cpp, java, rust, ruby, php, bash and more.

soma_generate_verified_codeA

Ask Soma to write code for a task. When the task is verifiable, the returned code has been executed against derived tests in an isolated sandbox before it is returned, and a certificate (verdict + tests passed) is attached. Include concrete examples in the prompt (e.g. doctest-style '>>> f(2) == 4') to make the result verifiable rather than best-effort.

Prompts

Interactive templates invoked by user choice

NameDescription

No prompts

Resources

Contextual data attached and managed by the client

NameDescription

No resources

TDQS

A4.3/5.0

Scored across 2 tools

Disambiguation5/5

The two tools have clearly distinct purposes: one verifies provided code, the other generates code with verification. There is no overlap or confusion between them.

Naming Consistency5/5

Both tools follow the identical pattern of 'soma_' prefix plus a verb_noun structure: verify_code and generate_verified_code. Naming is uniform and predictable.

Tool Count3/5

With only 2 tools, the server is minimal but focused on a narrow purpose. While the count feels thin for a general toolkit, it is reasonable for a specialized verification service. It sits at the borderline.

Completeness4/5

The server covers the core workflows of code verification and generation with verification. Minor gaps exist, such as no ability to fetch or check certificate details after generation, but the primary lifecycle is covered.

Maintenance

ActivityMaintained
ResponsivenessNo issues