Skip to main content
Glama
medhakara

spec-to-delivery

by medhakara

Server Configuration

Describes the environment variables required to run the server.

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Instructions

Guidance the server publishes about itself, which clients place ahead of the tool catalog so the model reads it before choosing anything.

This server publishes no instructions, or was last inspected before Glama recorded them.

Capabilities

Features and capabilities supported by this server

Protocol revision2025-11-25

CapabilityDetails
tools
{
  "listChanged": true
}

Tools

Functions exposed to the LLM to take actions

NameDescription
parse_requirementsA

Extract identified requirements (REQ-001 style IDs) from a Markdown requirements document. Returns id, text, section, priority and line number for each.

diff_requirementsA

Compare two versions of a requirements document by requirement ID. Returns added, removed, changed (with before/after text) and unchanged IDs.

parse_scenariosA

Parse Gherkin feature text and return each scenario with the requirement IDs it is linked to (via @REQ-001 tags or IDs in the scenario title).

traceability_matrixC

Build a requirement-to-scenario traceability matrix. Returns per-requirement coverage, uncovered requirement IDs, orphan scenarios, unknown IDs, a coverage percentage, and a ready-to-paste Markdown table.

Prompts

Interactive templates invoked by user choice

NameDescription

No prompts

Resources

Contextual data attached and managed by the client

NameDescription

No resources

TDQS

A3.6/5.0

Scored across 4 tools

Disambiguation5/5

Each tool has a distinct purpose: parsing requirements, diffing requirements, parsing scenarios, and building a traceability matrix. There is no overlap or ambiguity; an agent can easily select the correct tool for a specific task.

Naming Consistency4/5

The first three tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern (parse_requirements, diff_requirements, parse_scenarios), but traceability_matrix is a noun phrase rather than a verb_action. This minor deviation is easily readable but slightly inconsistent.

Tool Count5/5

Four tools is well within the ideal range and each tool covers a distinct stage of the requirements-to-scenario workflow. The scope is focused and every tool earns its place.

Completeness4/5

The tool set covers parsing, diffing, scenario extraction, and traceability, which forms a coherent core workflow. A minor gap is the lack of tools for updating or generating requirements, but this is not a severe omission for the stated purpose.

Maintenance

ActivityMaintained
ResponsivenessNo issues