etabs_assign_frame_releases

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description explains the effect of setting releases, describes the boolean array meaning, and notes that a confirmation is returned. Annotations indicate idempotent and non-destructive behavior; the description aligns with these. No contradictions.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is well-structured with a brief intro, bullet-like explanation of release lists, common patterns, and an Args section. It is clear and informative, though the explanation of the 6-element list could be slightly more concise.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the complexity of releases and the presence of an output schema, the description covers parameter meanings, common usage, and return. It lacks prerequisites (e.g., frame must exist) but is otherwise complete for the tool's purpose.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, but the description thoroughly explains each parameter in the Args section, including the release list format and common patterns. This adds significant meaning beyond the schema, which only has names and types.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool's purpose: 'Set end releases (moment releases / pins) for a frame object.' It uses specific verbs and distinguishes from siblings like etabs_assign_frame_section or etabs_assign_frame_load.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides common patterns and explains the release list format, which implies usage context but does not explicitly state when to use this tool versus alternatives or when not to use it. No exclusions or comparisons are given.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.