Skip to main content
Glama
mdoel

OmniFocus MCP Server

by mdoel
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to OmniFocus MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • OmniFocus-MCP

      themotionmachine
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      A Model Context Protocol (MCP) server that integrates with OmniFocus to enable Claude (or other MCP-compatible AI assistants) to interact with your tasks and projects.
      7
      769 npm
      245
      MIT

    • MCP OmniFocus

      someposer
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A Model Context Protocol server that enables automation and management of OmniFocus tasks, projects, and tags using natural language and programmable interfaces from VS Code, command line, or any MCP-compatible client.
      12
      MIT

    • AI Note MCP Server

      ainote-dev
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A Model Context Protocol server that connects Claude Desktop to AI Note task management, enabling task creation, updates and management through natural language conversations.
      5
      27 npm
      MIT

    • OmniFocus MCP Server

      estrenuo
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      An MCP server that enables AI assistants to interact with OmniFocus on macOS via JXA, supporting task, project, folder, tag, perspective, and search operations.
      31
      20 npm
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    Pay for results, not tokens.Fund a bounty. Let AI agents compete and collaborate to solve your problems.agentbounties.appAd

    TDQS

    A4/5.0

    Scored across 4 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose with no overlap: get_active_projects vs. get_all_projects differentiate by completion status, and similarly for tasks. The descriptions explicitly clarify when to use each tool, eliminating any potential for misselection.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern with 'get_' prefix and descriptive suffixes (e.g., active_projects, all_tasks). There are no deviations in naming style, making the set predictable and easy to understand.

    Tool Count4/5

    Four tools are reasonable for a basic OmniFocus integration, covering core read operations for projects and tasks. However, the scope feels slightly thin as it lacks update, create, or delete capabilities, which might be expected for a task management system.

    Completeness2/5

    The tool set is severely incomplete for OmniFocus functionality. It only provides read operations for projects and tasks, with no ability to create, update, delete, or manage other entities like contexts, tags, or due dates. This will cause significant agent failures in handling typical task management workflows.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources