Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to dosbox-x-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server providing emulator control for a loopback-only DOSBox-X QMP server, with tools for keyboard input, memory reads, screenshots, and state snapshots to complement Ghidra's GDB TraceRMI debugging.
      13
      1
      Apache 2.0
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      This MCP server enables AI agents to inspect and control the native DOSBox-X debugger through bounded MCP tools, including breakpoint management, execution control, register/memory inspection, and disassembly for DOS program debugging and reverse engineering.
      1
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Bridges AI agents to a DOSBox emulator, enabling control of DOS programs via MCP tools for typing, screen reading, video capture, Lua scripting, and memory access.
      2
      GPL 2.0
    • F
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables an MCP client to observe and control a text-mode DOS system via a Python bridge, supporting keyboard input and screen capture.
      8
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables headless debugging of Windows executables from Linux/macOS hosts by orchestrating winedbg's gdbserver and a GDB client, exposing 19 tools for launch, attach, breakpoints, stepping, register/memory access, and session lifecycle.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables any MCP-capable AI to headlessly launch and dynamically instrument Windows executables via IDA Pro's PIN tracer, with tools for breakpoints, register/memory access, execution control, and instruction tracing without opening the IDA GUI.
      15
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.9/5.0

    Scored across 26 tools

    Disambiguation3/5

    The tools cluster into clear capability areas, but within some clusters the boundaries are narrow: view_screen, capture_screen, read_framebuffer, and watch_frames all provide screen-related output, and launch/attach/find_guest all establish a guest context in different ways. The detailed descriptions make the distinctions learnable, but an agent would need to read them carefully before selecting the right tool.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    The dosbox_ prefix plus snake_case is used consistently, and most tools follow a clear verb_noun pattern such as send_keys, read_memory, and install_trace. A few resource/query names such as dosbox_profiles, dosbox_sessions, and dosbox_capabilities drop the verb form, which is a minor but noticeable inconsistency.

    Tool Count4/5

    26 tools is large and heavier than the conventional well-scoped 3-15 range, but the tool set represents a genuinely broad and specialized domain: process management, input, memory inspection/editing, frame capture, tracing, and recording. The size feels deliberately broad rather than padded.

    Completeness5/5

    The set covers the full workflow of driving and inspecting a DOSBox-X guest: launch/attach/quit, keyboard/mouse input, read/write/search/dump memory, sample state over time, watch screen frames, and install/read/remove code traces. No major dead-end operations are apparent that would force the agent to leave the server to complete a task.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues