Newton MCP Gateway
Related Servers
Alternatives to Newton MCP Gateway
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables MCP-compatible agents such as Claude and Cursor to retrieve permission-aware, structured context from local or hosted data stores. Exposes tools for semantic search, entity and relationship lookup, memory access, context pack compilation, source attribution, and retrieval explanation.1Apache 2.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables LLMs to connect to n8n workflows, Blender 3D, Notion, and filesystem tools through a single MCP hub with hot-pluggable bridges. Features a pedagogical transparency layer for educational purposes and supports multiple LLM providers including Claude, OpenAI, Gemini, and Ollama.4MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables MCP clients such as Claude, Copilot and IDE agents to interrogate a building's digital twin in plain language through seven tools covering building overview, room lists, per-room design promises, diagnosed findings, room time series, sandboxed read-only SQL and BCF issue export. Answers whether each room still meets its own design intent — and why not — instead of relying on fixed thresholds.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables MCP clients to discover and create agents, durably submit messages with verifiable replies, and search source-linked local memory. Exposes eight authenticated tools with owner-approved OAuth, transcript-backed verification, and explicit control over history import and embedding.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables agents to run hybrid retrieval, build token-budgeted attributed context packs, answer questions with citation and groundedness-gated release, explore temporal graph entities, evaluate claim support, and ingest screened, embedded documents through typed MCP tools.Apache 2.0
- FlicenseBqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI agents to query an air-gapped enterprise knowledge vault via seven MCP tools for deterministic and hybrid retrieval, entity graph traversal, context compression, archive inspection, onboarding scans, and node status.7-
TDQS
Scored across 4 tools
Tools have mostly distinct purposes: analyze_image for image Q&A, propose_action for action contracts, embed_timeseries for embeddings, and query for general text/JSON Q&A. Potential overlap exists between query and analyze_image since both ask natural-language questions, and query's structured JSON capability could be confused with propose_action, though descriptions clarify boundaries.
All tools share a consistent 'newton_' prefix, and three of four follow a verb_noun pattern (analyze_image, propose_action, embed_timeseries). The bare verb 'newton_query' is a minor deviation but remains readable and predictable.
Four tools is a well-scoped set for a model gateway, each covering a distinct capability (image, action, embedding, query). The count is within the ideal 3–15 range, and no tool feels redundant or missing from the core set.
The surface covers key interactions with Newton C: querying, image analysis, action proposal, and timeseries embedding. A file upload tool is absent, but the tools accept base64 inline or pre-existing file_ids, so agents can work around it; no execution tool is expected by design.