Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to tracehub-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables natural language querying and analysis of OpenTelemetry traces, metrics, and logs stored in Elasticsearch/OpenSearch, allowing AI assistants to investigate performance issues, find root causes, and explore system behavior.
      16 npm
      14
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Connects AI assistants to Warpmetrics telemetry data to monitor AI agent performance, execution runs, and LLM costs. It allows users to query success rates, latency, and spend metrics directly through natural language interfaces.
      20
      75 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants and LLMs to query SigNoz observability data (metrics, traces, logs, alerts, dashboards) using natural language.
      125
      Apache 2.0
    • F
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Connects AI agents to live observability stacks including Sentry, GitHub, Vercel, Better Stack, and Cloudflare, enabling end-to-end incident investigation, deployment correlation, root cause analysis, and regression triage.
      14
      -
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server that gives AI agents access to your application's OpenTelemetry traces for querying, analysis, and debugging.
      5
      16 npm
      2
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.7/5.0

    Scored across 19 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools target clearly distinct resources or analytical tasks—trace lookup/search, LLM usage, sessions, models, prompts, and spike investigation are separated. A few tools overlap in spirit (search_traces vs find_errors, compare_time_windows vs investigate_cost_spike), but the descriptions provide enough differentiation to avoid serious misselection.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    The overwhelming majority follow a clean snake_case verb_noun pattern (list_services, get_trace, investigate_cost_spike, get_llm_model_stats). The deviations are search_spans_tool and list_llm_tools_tool, whose redundant or awkward _tool suffix breaks the otherwise predictable convention.

    Tool Count3/5

    Nineteen tools is on the heavy side and sits in the 16-25 range where a toolset starts to feel bulky. The breadth is somewhat justified by the combination of general tracing, LLM analytics, session analysis, and spike investigation, but several specialized investigation tools could arguably be folded into fewer general-purpose tools.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers trace search/retrieval, root-cause reasoning, error discovery, LLM usage/model stats, session grouping, prompt metrics, and cost/error spike analysis, leaving few obvious dead ends. Notable minor gaps are per-service detailed performance metrics and dependency/map-style analysis tools.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues