Skip to main content
Glama
Sign In
MCP Rating Gateway

MCP Rating Gateway

by mcprating
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to MCP Rating Gateway

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • Multi-MCP Proxy

      kfirtoledo
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A flexible MCP proxy server that connects to and routes between multiple backend MCP servers over STDIO or SSE, enabling dynamic management and namespacing of tools.
      111
      MIT

    • relay-mcp

      yujoonko1
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables developers to expose any dev tool as a safe, audited MCP server with permission tiers, audit logging, and automatic argument validation.
      MIT

    • dynamic-mcp

      mcpland
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Dynamic MCP server for Node.js enabling runtime tool creation, management, and execution in isolated sandboxes (Docker or Node).
      8
      8 npm
      1
      MIT

    • proxy-mcp

      Rixmerz
      F
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Universal MCP proxy server that discovers, searches, and executes tools across all configured MCP servers from a single entry point.
      7
      -

    • scriptit

      shreyjindal81
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables agents to connect to remote MCP servers once, access their tools through a compact MCP endpoint, pair a CLI inside sandboxes, and create watches that turn command or tool output into pollable structured events.
      2
      -
    Deploy Server
    Claude Code, inside the Godot 4 editorFlockbay puts an AI agent in the real Godot 4 editor: it writes GDScript, runs your game and fixes what breaks. Free, or bring your own Claude Code or Codex.flockbay.comAd

    TDQS

    A3.6/5.0

    Scored across 13 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools target clearly distinct operations (discover, connect, disconnect, call, audit, health, usage). The main soft spots are mcp_discover vs mcp_recommend (both 'find me a server') and mcp_list_active vs mcp_server_info (both about connected servers), though descriptions give enough hints to separate them.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    All tools share a clean mcp_ prefix in snake_case, which is highly predictable. Minor deviation: most are verb-led (mcp_discover, mcp_connect, mcp_call_tool) but several are bare nouns (mcp_profiles, mcp_groups, mcp_usage, mcp_sandbox) with an implied 'manage'.

    Tool Count5/5

    13 tools sits squarely in the well-scoped range and maps neatly onto the gateway lifecycle. Each tool covers a distinct concern (registry, connections, security, diagnostics, analytics) without redundancy.

    Completeness4/5

    The connection lifecycle is fully covered: discover, connect, list, inspect, call, sandbox-configure, disconnect, plus audit/health/usage monitoring. Minor gaps exist around credential/auth management and registry publish/remove operations, but core gateway workflows have no dead ends.

    Maintenance

    ActivityActive
    ResponsivenessNo recent community issues

    Resources