Skip to main content
Glama
mcpland

mock-mcp

by mcpland
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to mock-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • Schema Bridge MCP Server

      rafim-dev
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables schema conversion from SQL/Prisma/JSON to Zod, TypeScript, and Pydantic, and generates realistic synthetic mock data.
      3
      MIT

    • SeedWeaver

      FixtureForge
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Generates realistic, referentially-coherent test data (SQL INSERTs, JSON, or CSV) from your database schema, resolving foreign keys and respecting constraints. Paste CREATE TABLE DDL or a JSON schema and get ready-to-run seed data with valid relationships.
      2
      53 npm
      MIT
    • MockLoop MCP Server by MockLoop

      MockLoop MCP Serverofficial

      MockLoop
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      A Model Context Protocol server that generates and runs mock API servers from API documentation like OpenAPI/Swagger specs, enabling developers and AI assistants to quickly spin up mock backends for development and testing.
      17
      MIT

    • Faker MCP Server

      funsjanssen
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Generates realistic mock data using Faker.js for database seeding, API testing, and development environments. Supports person/company data, custom patterns, multi-locale generation, and structured datasets with referential integrity.
      4
      38 npm
      7
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A4/5.0

    Scored across 6 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: claiming, getting details, providing data, releasing, and status queries. No overlap or ambiguity.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern in snake_case, making the API predictable and easy to navigate.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 6 tools covering the core workflow (claim, provide, release, inspect), the count is well-scoped and each tool serves a necessary function.

    Completeness5/5

    The tool set fully covers the mock batch lifecycle: claiming, providing data, releasing, plus status and batch details. No obvious gaps for the stated purpose.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources