Skip to main content
Glama
mcpdotdirect

Starknet MCP Server

by mcpdotdirect

Related Servers

Alternatives to Starknet MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • -
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      Not graded
      maintenance
      Comprehensive Model Context Protocol server that enables AI agents to interact with 30+ Ethereum-compatible blockchain networks, supporting token transfers, smart contract interactions, and ENS name resolution through a unified interface.
      1
      -
    • F
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      A server that exposes blockchain data (balances, tokens, NFTs, contract metadata) via the Model Context Protocol, enabling AI agents and tools to access and analyze blockchain information contextually.
      18
      46
      -
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A Model Context Protocol server that enables AI agents to interact with 30+ Ethereum-compatible blockchain networks, providing services like token transfers, contract interactions, and ENS resolution through a unified interface.
      28
      108 npm
      379
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A Model Context Protocol server implementation for Stability blockchain that enables AI agents to interact with Stability Protocol without gas fees.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A Model Context Protocol server that enables AI models to interact with the Solana blockchain, providing RPC methods, wallet management, DeFi trading capabilities, and Helius API integration for enhanced Solana development.
      5
      MIT

    TDQS

    B3.4/5.0

    Scored across 25 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose, targeting specific operations such as balance queries for different tokens (ETH, STRK, native, generic), NFT checks (ownership vs balance), transfers, and contract interactions. No two tools are ambiguous.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent 'verb_starknet_noun' pattern using snake_case (e.g., get_starknet_eth_balance, transfer_starknet_token). The verbs are appropriate and consistent across the set.

    Tool Count4/5

    25 tools is on the higher side but justifiable for a comprehensive Starknet server covering blocks, transactions, contracts, tokens, NFTs, IDs, and transfers. Each tool serves a specific function without redundancy.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool set covers major Starknet operations: reading/writing contracts, querying balances, transfers, block/transaction info, NFT ownership, and domain resolution. Minor gaps like event querying or contract deployment exist, but core workflows are covered.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessUnresponsive