Skip to main content
Glama
mcp360

MCP360 Universal Gateway

Official
by mcp360
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to MCP360 Universal Gateway

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • Nervora

      sveselaj
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A secure MCP gateway for enterprise AI tool execution, enabling governed invocation of business tools with authentication, RBAC, audit logging, PII redaction, and async processing.
      Apache 2.0

    • mcp-anything

      Dror-Bengal
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables models to discover, inspect, and call tools from thousands of MCP servers on the fly through a single gateway, without pre-configuring each server.
      5
      46 npm
      3
      MIT

    • MCPBridge

      Samadritaacharya
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables enterprise AI agents to discover and invoke MCP tools, resources, and prompts across GitHub, ITSM, and business systems through a policy-controlled gateway with human approval and auditability.
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    C2/5.0

    Scored across 2 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    The two tools have clearly distinct purposes: 'execute' suggests performing an action or running something, while 'search' implies finding or retrieving information. There is no overlap or ambiguity between these functions, making it easy for an agent to choose the correct tool.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Both tool names follow a consistent pattern: they are single, descriptive verbs in lowercase. There are no deviations in style or convention, making the naming predictable and easy to understand across the set.

    Tool Count2/5

    With only two tools, the server feels thin for a 'Universal Gateway', which implies broad functionality. This limited set is likely insufficient for comprehensive coverage of a gateway's typical operations, such as routing, transformation, or monitoring, making it borderline too few for the apparent scope.

    Completeness2/5

    Given the server's name as a 'Universal Gateway', there are significant gaps in the tool surface. Core gateway operations like configuration management, logging, or connection handling are missing, leaving agents unable to perform essential tasks beyond basic execution and search, which will likely cause failures in broader workflows.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources