Skip to main content
Glama
mcp360

MCP360 Universal Gateway

Official
by mcp360

Related Servers

Alternatives to MCP360 Universal Gateway

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables organizations to centrally govern agent tool access by exposing authorized MCP tools through a unified endpoint with search and execute functions, while enforcing function-level permissions, credential modes, and auditability.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables teams to onboard remote MCP servers, enforce function-level permissions and credential modes, and let developers expose permitted tools through a unified MCP endpoint with search and execute functions while auditing usage.
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables users to aggregate, discover, and route remote MCP tools through a unified endpoint, with category-based access tokens, OAuth authorization, and admin management/analytics for self-hosted infrastructure.
      -
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables teams to onboard remote MCP servers, enforce function-level allow lists and credential modes, and let developers expose permitted tool bundles through a unified MCP endpoint with search and execute functions while keeping permissions and auditing enforced.
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables teams to govern agent tool access with function-level allow-lists, credential modes, and audited execution, while exposing permitted MCP tools through a unified endpoint with search and execute functions.
      MIT

    TDQS

    C2/5.0

    Scored across 2 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    The two tools have clearly distinct purposes: 'execute' suggests performing an action or running something, while 'search' implies finding or retrieving information. There is no overlap or ambiguity between these functions, making it easy for an agent to choose the correct tool.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Both tool names follow a consistent pattern: they are single, descriptive verbs in lowercase. There are no deviations in style or convention, making the naming predictable and easy to understand across the set.

    Tool Count2/5

    With only two tools, the server feels thin for a 'Universal Gateway', which implies broad functionality. This limited set is likely insufficient for comprehensive coverage of a gateway's typical operations, such as routing, transformation, or monitoring, making it borderline too few for the apparent scope.

    Completeness2/5

    Given the server's name as a 'Universal Gateway', there are significant gaps in the tool surface. Core gateway operations like configuration management, logging, or connection handling are missing, leaving agents unable to perform essential tasks beyond basic execution and search, which will likely cause failures in broader workflows.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues