clear_colors

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Although annotations are absent, the description discloses the destructive nature ('removes all color overrides') and the return value (count of processed elements). However, it does not discuss prerequisites, error behavior, or reversibility.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is concise, front-loading the purpose in the first sentence, and uses a clear structure with separate Args and Returns sections. Every sentence adds value without repetition.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple one-parameter tool with no output schema, the description covers the parameter and return value sufficiently. However, it lacks preconditions (e.g., document must be open, category must exist) and does not specify the exact format of the return result, leaving some gaps.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

With 0% schema description coverage, the description adds essential meaning by explaining the parameter 'category_name' as the category to clear colors from and providing concrete examples ('Walls', 'Doors'). This significantly compensates for the schema's lack of description.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb 'Clear' and resource 'color overrides for elements in a category', specifying the action and scope. It also distinguishes from sibling tools like 'color_splash' which applies overrides, making the purpose unambiguous.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides examples of category names but gives no explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. It does not mention when not to use it or recommend other tools for related tasks.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.