fleetalert-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to fleetalert-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceAn MCP server exposing scoped, read-only enterprise operations tools with fail-closed credential handling. It returns opaque approval IDs for mutations and requires a separate operator approval command to release one-time capabilities.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables production-hardened MCP tool serving with OAuth 2.1 audience-restricted tokens, purpose-bound tools, human-in-the-loop approvals, containment, and audit trails for AI agents.Apache 2.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables MCP clients to search policies, look up bookings, list activities, create booking requests, issue or approve credits, and review audit records under role-based access. It enforces tenant isolation, filters fields by role, strips planted instructions from tool results, rate-limits each key, and writes tamper-evident audit logs.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceMCP server for the Production Master incident-investigation service, enabling any MCP client to drive investigations via tool calls with pass-through authentication.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables MCP clients such as editors to start and monitor missions, run the self-healing demo, list departments and blueprints, and approve tasks through the backend API. It also lets trusted departments discover and invoke explicitly granted external stdio or Streamable HTTP tools.1MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceGoverned MCP server for bank-grade agent tool access with RBAC, PII redaction, rate limiting, and audit logging.MIT
TDQS
Scored across 6 tools
The tools mostly target distinct needs: usage, alert listing, single alert summary, trace history, raw spans, and cross-alert activity. The main potential overlap is between get_trace and get_raw_spans, but the descriptions explicitly distinguish them by detail level and recommend get_trace by default.
All tools follow a clear verb_noun convention using get_ or list_ prefixes. The naming is predictable and readable throughout.
Six tools is well-scoped for an alert inspection/observability server. Each tool covers a distinct layer of information without excessive surface area.
Read-only inspection is well covered: alerts, investigation traces, raw spans, activity, and usage. However, the alert lifecycle includes statuses and human actions such as confirm/reject/resolve, but there are no action tools to mutate or progress an alert, which is a notable gap for the stated domain.