octo_find_profile_by_name

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden. It states 'Uses Cloud API' and 'Requires OCTO_API_TOKEN', which are useful operational constraints. However, it does not disclose behavior on no-match, exact vs partial matching (though the schema covers exact_match), or what is returned. The read-only nature is implied by 'Find' but not explicitly stated.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is three short sentences totaling 18 words, front-loaded with purpose, followed by prerequisites. Every sentence adds necessary context, with no redundancy or filler.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The description plus well-covered schema provides a basic understanding of the tool. However, with no output schema, no annotations, and no explicit usage guidance, it leaves gaps around return value format and when to choose this over similar sibling tools. It is adequate but not comprehensive.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema covers both parameters (name and exact_match) with descriptions, providing 100% coverage. The description adds no extra parameter-level detail beyond what is in the schema, so the baseline of 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb 'Find' and the resource 'Octo Browser profile', and specifies the lookup criterion ('by name (title)'). This is a specific and actionable purpose, though it does not explicitly distinguish from sibling tools like octo_search_profiles or octo_get_profile.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. It mentions prerequisites (Cloud API and token) but does not state in which scenarios this should be preferred over octo_search_profiles or octo_get_profile. Usage context is only implied by the tool name.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.