Skip to main content
Glama
mayankchugh-learning

expense-mcp

Related Servers

Alternatives to expense-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A simple demonstration MCP server that provides basic utility tools including dice rolling and number addition functionality. This server serves as a tutorial example for setting up both local and remote MCP servers using FastMCP.
      3
      -
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A sample MCP server that provides basic arithmetic tools like addition, subtraction, multiplication, and division. It serves as a demonstration for implementing the Model Context Protocol and connecting custom tools to clients like Claude Desktop.
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables basic arithmetic operations (add, subtract, multiply, divide, modulo) via natural language, with a FastMCP-based server and client for exploring MCP tool calling.
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A FastMCP server that provides mathematical tools (addition, multiplication, temperature conversion) for Claude to execute via natural language.
      -
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A simple MCP server that provides basic calculator functionality for performing mathematical operations. Built with FastMCP and demonstrates fundamental MCP server implementation patterns.
      -

    TDQS

    A4.5/5.0

    Scored across 3 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a distinct purpose: adding an expense, listing expenses by date range, and summarizing spending by category. There is no overlap or ambiguity.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern using snake_case (add_expense, list_expenses, summarize). The pattern is predictable and clear.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 3 tools, the server is well-scoped for its purpose of basic expense tracking. The count is neither too few nor too many for the apparent domain.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool surface covers adding, listing, and summarizing expenses, which covers core use cases. However, it lacks update and delete operations, which are minor gaps for complete lifecycle management.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues