Skip to main content
Glama
mayai-it

bandiradar-mcp

by mayai-it
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to bandiradar-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • EUACC EU Funding MCP Connector

      caraulani
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Provides AI assistants with real-time, verified European funding data including open grant calls, programmes, consortium partners, VCs, and incubators, enabling natural language queries about EU funding.
      MIT

    • Tender MCP

      OjasKord
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to find, score, and monitor government contract opportunities across UK, EU, and US with AI-powered relevance scoring.
      2
      75 npm
      1
      MIT

    • LexSocket MCP Server

      lexsocket
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables search and analysis of European public procurement tenders, including EU above-threshold (TED) and below-threshold from 11 national sources, with hybrid search and filtering.
      MIT

    • Grant Hunter MCP

      vitor-giacomelli
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Autonomously discovers non-dilutive funding opportunities from Grants.gov, generates AI-powered pitch drafts using Gemini, and integrates with Google Workspace to create email drafts and calendar reminders for grant deadlines.
      6
      MIT

    • EU Tender MCP

      omardaaboul
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      F
      maintenance
      Enables searching for EU public-procurement tenders, analyzing cross-border risk, and understanding tender details through tools for CPV code lookup, EU threshold checks, red-flag scanning, and SME fit scoring.
      7
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    B3.3/5.0

    Scored across 6 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a distinct role in the workflow: listing sources, ingesting opportunities, ranking opportunities, scoring a single opportunity, retrieving persisted matches, and inspecting the profile. Even the related matching tools are clearly separated by computation versus persistence.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent snake_case verb_noun pattern with clear, imperative verbs. There is no mixing of conventions or vague generic names.

    Tool Count5/5

    Six tools is a well-scoped size for a funding opportunity matching server. Each tool covers a meaningful part of the workflow without redundancy or bloat.

    Completeness4/5

    The core lifecycle of fetching sources, searching/ranking opportunities, scoring individual opportunities, and retrieving persisted matches is covered. Minor gaps exist around direct opportunity detail retrieval and profile management, but these are workable through existing tools.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources