Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to Amazing Marvin MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      D
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      A Model Context Protocol server that provides access to Aiven services (PostgreSQL, Kafka, ClickHouse, Valkey, OpenSearch), enabling LLMs to build full stack solutions by interacting with these services.
      3
      436 npm
      28
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      C
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      A Model Context Protocol server that allows AI assistants to interact with Appwrite's API, providing tools to manage databases, users, functions, teams, and other resources within Appwrite projects.
      49
      73
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A Model Context Protocol server that enables AI assistants to interact with Linear project management systems, allowing users to create, update, and manage issues, projects, teams, and comments through natural language.
      24,698 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A Model Context Protocol plugin that helps AI assistants maintain persistent project context through structured markdown files, providing a systematic approach to tracking project goals, decisions, progress, and patterns.
      3
      21 npm
      16
      MIT

    TDQS

    B3/5.0

    Scored across 29 tools

    Disambiguation3/5

    Most tools have distinct purposes, but there is notable overlap between some getter tools that could cause confusion. For example, get_completed_tasks and get_completed_tasks_for_date both retrieve completed tasks with only date filtering differences, and get_productivity_summary and get_productivity_summary_for_time_range are similar with time range variations. However, descriptions clarify these nuances, preventing major misselections.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Tool names follow a highly consistent verb_noun pattern throughout, such as create_task, get_projects, and start_time_tracking. There are no deviations in style (e.g., all use snake_case) or verb usage, making the set predictable and easy to navigate for an agent.

    Tool Count2/5

    With 29 tools, the count is excessive for a task management domain, leading to potential bloat and confusion. While the domain is broad, many tools could be consolidated (e.g., multiple productivity summary tools) or omitted without losing functionality, making it feel heavy and overwhelming for typical use cases.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool surface covers the task management domain comprehensively, including CRUD operations for tasks and projects, time tracking, productivity insights, and account management. Minor gaps exist, such as no explicit update or delete tools for tasks or projects, but agents can work around this using other methods like marking tasks done or batch operations.