Skip to main content
Glama
maxronner

@maxronner/tea-mcp

by maxronner

Server Configuration

Describes the environment variables required to run the server.

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Instructions

Guidance the server publishes about itself, which clients place ahead of the tool catalog so the model reads it before choosing anything.

This server publishes no instructions, or was last inspected before Glama recorded them.

Capabilities

Features and capabilities supported by this server

Protocol revision2025-11-25

CapabilityDetails
tools
{
  "listChanged": true
}

Tools

Functions exposed to the LLM to take actions

NameDescription
tea_issues_listB

List issues in the current repository

tea_issue_viewA

View details of a specific issue

tea_issue_closeB

Close an issue

tea_issue_reopenC

Reopen a closed issue

tea_issue_createB

Create a new issue in the current repository

tea_create_commentA

Add a comment to an issue or pull request

tea_prs_listC

List pull requests in the current repository

tea_pr_viewA

View details of a specific pull request

tea_pr_checkoutB

Checkout a pull request locally

tea_pr_createA

Create a new pull request with optional preview mode to review changes first

tea_pr_approveB

Approve a pull request

tea_pr_rejectB

Request changes on a pull request

tea_pr_mergeB

Merge a pull request

tea_repos_listB

List repositories you have access to

tea_repo_viewA

View details of a repository

Prompts

Interactive templates invoked by user choice

NameDescription

No prompts

Resources

Contextual data attached and managed by the client

NameDescription

No resources

TDQS

A3.5/5.0

Scored across 15 tools

Disambiguation5/5

Each tool targets a distinct resource and action: issues have list/view/close/reopen/create, PRs have list/view/checkout/create/approve/reject/merge, plus comment creation and repo view/list. No two tools overlap in purpose.

Naming Consistency4/5

Most tools follow a resource_action pattern (tea_issue_view, tea_pr_merge), but there are deviations: 'tea_prs_list' uses plural 'prs' while others use 'pr', and 'tea_create_comment' uses action_resource instead of resource_action.

Tool Count5/5

15 tools is well-scoped for a Git hosting server covering repositories, issues, pull requests, and comments. Each tool earns its place without bloat or redundancy.

Completeness4/5

Core workflows are covered: issue lifecycle (create, view, list, close, reopen), PR lifecycle (create, view, list, merge, approve, reject, checkout), and comments. Minor gaps include lack of update/edit operations for issues and PRs, and no repo creation or deletion, but these do not cause major dead ends.

Maintenance

ActivityInactive
ResponsivenessNo issues