task-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to task-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server that wraps the Taskwarrior CLI to allow AI assistants to create, query, modify, and manage tasks directly from agentic coding tools.7 npmMIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server that enables AI assistants to interact with the Taskwarrior command-line task management tool. It allows users to list, create, modify, and organize tasks using projects, tags, and annotations through natural language.132MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for task management that enables AI agents to read, create, update tasks, and track work sessions, allowing agents and humans to collaborate on the same task board.5 npm9MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceA minimal MCP server for file-based task management and multi-agent team orchestration, enabling creation, completion, and reassignment of tasks across teams.-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA task management MCP server that provides tools to create, list, complete, and delete tasks using pluggable storage backends. It enables users to interact with their task lists through natural language using MCP-compatible clients like Claude Desktop.-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceA personal task management MCP server that allows LLM clients to create, read, update, and delete tasks with projects, labels, and comments, using a local SQLite database that can also be accessed via a web UI.-
TDQS
Scored across 10 tools
Every tool has a clearly distinct purpose targeting specific task lifecycle actions: creation (create_task), retrieval (get_task, list_tasks), modification (update_task, annotate_task), state changes (start_task, stop_task, complete_task), deletion (delete_task), and project management (project_list). There is no overlap or ambiguity between tools.
All tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern with clear action verbs (create, get, list, update, delete, start, stop, complete, annotate) and consistent noun usage (task or project). The naming is perfectly uniform and predictable throughout the set.
With 10 tools, this is well-scoped for a task management server. Each tool earns its place by covering distinct aspects of task lifecycle management, project listing, and task operations without being excessive or insufficient for the domain.
The tool set provides complete CRUD/lifecycle coverage for task management: create, read (get/list), update, delete, plus specialized operations (start/stop/complete/annotate) and project listing. There are no obvious gaps, and agents can perform all expected workflows without dead ends.