Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to task-planner

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables MCP-capable agents to solve scheduling and integer optimization problems using Google OR-Tools, return proven-optimal or valid solutions, independently verify proposed solutions, and explain infeasible rule sets.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables MCP clients to schedule task graphs, compute critical paths and slack, lease lock-aware parallel cohorts to agents, version plan-as-code variants, and track earned value with resource leveling and Monte Carlo risk analysis.
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables agents to read household context, capture draft tasks, analyze schedule ripple effects, and propose plans while enforcing human-only approval, stale-plan refusal, and idempotent requests.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables users to plan cost-aware task decomposition and model assignment by capability and credit multiplier, with optional execution through an OpenAI-compatible endpoint and relative credit reporting.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables monitoring of running agent loops with token and monetary cost estimation, pruning of verbose thinking chains near limits, and routing sub-tasks between fast/cheap and deep reasoning models. It provides deterministic, MCP-compatible budget optimization for autonomous agents and copilot frameworks.
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.5/5.0

    Scored across 3 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    The three tools have distinct core purposes: full planning, incremental next-action selection, and validation of a proposed selection. plan_tasks and plan_next_action both involve planning and could be confused at first glance, but the descriptions clarify their different outputs and usage contexts.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names use a consistent snake_case verb-based pattern: plan_tasks, plan_next_action, check_plan. The convention is predictable and readable.

    Tool Count5/5

    Three tools are well-scoped for a task planner: one for full planning, one for replanning the next action, and one for validating a plan. Each tool has a clear role and earns its place.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers full planning, incremental replanning, and plan validation, which are the core lifecycle operations for this domain. Minor gaps might include explaining why a plan is infeasible or suggesting repairs, but agents can work around these by using check_plan and replanning.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo recent community issues