Execute Product Creation

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Beyond the annotations (destructiveHint=true, readOnlyHint=false), the description adds critical behavioral context: it actually creates the product, requires a prior preview, and has a production-store specific requirement. This enriches the agent's understanding of side effects and preconditions.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is two sentences, front-loaded with the core action, and every word earns its place. No redundancy or padding.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the lack of output schema, the description covers the essential context: what it does, the precondition (prior preview), and an important special case. It could mention what the response contains, but that's not necessary for tool selection and invocation.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema covers all parameters, but the description adds semantic weight to confirm_production by explaining its real-world necessity for production stores. It also implies operation_id is tied to the prior preview, linking it to the workflow.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description clearly states 'Execute a previewed product creation' and 'This actually creates the product,' distinguishing it from the preview and planning siblings. The specific verb 'execute' and resource 'product creation' make the purpose unambiguous.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly states the usage prerequisite: 'Requires prior preview' and provides a conditional rule for production stores ('Production stores require confirm_production: true'). While it doesn't name alternatives directly, the plan/preview/execute sibling pattern makes the workflow clear.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.