Nuanced MCP Server
Server Configuration
Describes the environment variables required to run the server.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Instructions
Guidance the server publishes about itself, which clients place ahead of the tool catalog so the model reads it before choosing anything.
This server publishes no instructions, or was last inspected before Glama recorded them.
Capabilities
Server capabilities have not been inspected yet.
Tools
Functions exposed to the LLM to take actions
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
| initialize_graphC | Initialize a code graph for the given repository path. Args: repo_path: Path to the repository to analyze Returns: Success message with information about the initialized graph |
| switch_repositoryC | Switch to a different initialized repository. Args: repo_path: Path to the repository to switch to Returns: Success message or error |
| list_repositoriesB | List all initialized repositories. Returns: List of initialized repositories |
| get_function_call_graphC | Get the call graph for a specific function. Args: file_path: Path to the file containing the function function_name: Name of the function to analyze repo_path: Optional repository path (uses active repository if not specified) Returns: Information about the function's call graph |
| analyze_dependenciesB | Find all module or file dependencies in the codebase. Identifies all function dependencies for a file or module in the active repository. This identifies all modules that depend on the specified module or file. Args: file_path: Path to a specific file to analyze dependencies for module_name: Name of a module to analyze dependencies for (e.g., 'auth' will match 'app.auth', 'auth.users', etc.) Returns: A list of all functions and files that depend on the specified module |
| analyze_change_impactC | Analyze the impact of changing a specific function. This tool performs a comprehensive impact analysis to help understand what would be affected if you modify the specified function. Args: file_path: Path to the file containing the function function_name: Name of the function to analyze Returns: A detailed analysis of the potential impact of changing the function |
Prompts
Interactive templates invoked by user choice
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
| analyze_function | Create a prompt to analyze a function with its call graph. |
| impact_analysis | Create a prompt to analyze the impact of changing a function. |
| analyze_dependencies_prompt | Create a prompt to analyze dependencies of a file or module. |
Resources
Contextual data attached and managed by the client
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
| graph://summary |
TDQS
Scored across 6 tools
Most tools have distinct purposes: analyze_change_impact focuses on modification consequences, analyze_dependencies finds what depends on a module, get_function_call_graph shows function call relationships, and the last three handle repository management. However, analyze_dependencies and get_function_call_graph could be confused as both involve dependency/call analysis, though their descriptions clarify one is module-level and the other function-level.
The naming follows a consistent verb_noun pattern throughout (e.g., analyze_change_impact, get_function_call_graph, list_repositories), with all tools using snake_case. The only minor deviation is that 'initialize_graph' uses a verb without a clear noun object, but it still fits the overall pattern.
With 6 tools, the count is well-scoped for a code analysis server. It covers core functions like impact analysis, dependency tracking, call graph generation, and repository management, with each tool earning its place without being overwhelming or too sparse.
The server covers key code analysis operations (impact, dependencies, call graphs) and repository management, but there are notable gaps. For example, it lacks tools for updating or deleting initialized repositories, and there's no way to clear or reset graphs, which could leave agents in dead ends when managing repository states.