configure_trigger_edge

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Without annotations, the description must cover behavioral traits. It mentions the side effect of setting the trigger mode to EDGE, and that it's a partial update. However, it does not discuss error conditions, prerequisites, or whether changes are reversible.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description consists of two concise sentences. The purpose is front-loaded, and there is no redundant information. It could be slightly more specific about the parameters, but it remains efficient.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With 4 parameters and no annotations or output schema, the description provides the core functionality but lacks information about return values, error handling, or state dependencies. It is adequate but not fully complete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 50% (level and source have descriptions). The description merely lists the parameters without adding semantic detail beyond the schema, so it does not significantly compensate for the missing schema descriptions.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly specifies the verb 'configure' and the resource 'edge triggering', listing the parameters. It distinguishes from sibling configuration tools by focusing on edge triggering specifically.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description states that the tool sets the trigger mode to EDGE and only applies the given parameters, providing clear context for usage. However, it does not explicitly mention when not to use it or list alternatives.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.