Skip to main content
Glama
mattias242

protonmail-mcp-server

by mattias242

Related Servers

Alternatives to protonmail-mcp-server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server for reading and searching Proton Mail via Proton Mail Bridge, providing tools to list mailboxes, list/search messages, and get message details with TLS certificate pinning.
      4
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Self-hosted MCP server that enables reading, sending, and automating Proton Mail via Bridge, with optional SimpleLogin alias management.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      An MCP server that reads, searches, organizes, and deletes Proton Mail through the local Proton Mail Bridge, with read-only mode and sender authentication checks. It cannot send mail.
      58 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Unofficial MCP server for Proton Mail (not affiliated with Proton AG) — send, read, search & organize email over SMTP/IMAP
      31
      58 npm
      6
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables MCP clients to interact with Proton Mail through a self-hosted server that works alongside Proton Mail Bridge. It provides read-only mailbox tools such as listing folders, searching mail, and retrieving messages while keeping Bridge isolated from the network.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A read-only MCP server that connects to Proton Mail via Proton Bridge, enabling AI assistants to search, list, and read emails securely without leaving your machine.
      4
      23 npm
      1
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.6/5.0

    Scored across 16 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct resource and action: listing mailboxes, getting status, fetching headers vs full email, searching, marking read/unread, moving, deleting, sending, replying, forwarding, and folder CRUD. Even get_email_headers and get_email are clearly separated by intent (metadata vs full content).

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern with lowercase and underscores (e.g., list_mailboxes, get_email, send_email, create_folder). The only minor deviation is reply_to_email, but it still fits the pattern with a preposition, maintaining overall consistency.

    Tool Count4/5

    At 16 tools, the server is slightly above the ideal 3-15 range, but each tool covers a distinct and necessary operation for a full email client workflow. The count feels justified given the breadth of actions (mailboxes, email states, sending, folders) and does not feel bloated.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool surface covers the core email lifecycle: read (list, get, search), update (mark read/unread, move), delete, send, reply, forward, and folder management (list, create, rename, delete). Minor gaps exist like attachment handling, drafts, and flagging, but these are not critical for basic email automation.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues