Skip to main content
Glama
matteuccimarco

SLIM MCP Server

by matteuccimarco
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to SLIM MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • Web Reader

      zacfire
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables Claude and other LLMs to read and parse web content, with smart fallback strategies to bypass access restrictions (e.g., paywalls, Cloudflare) and output Markdown.
      5
      13 npm
      45
      MIT

    • Fetch MCP Server

      micaelmalta
      F
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Reduces token consumption by 73-87% by cleaning web and API data before it reaches the LLM context window. Supports fetching URLs, searching the web, optimizing JSON, and more.
      6
      1
      -

    • Web Content Extractor MCP

      agenson-tools
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to extract clean, structured web content (articles, tables, links, visual layouts) optimized for LLM token efficiency, with fast response times and optional JavaScript support.
      5
      29 npm
      MIT

    • web2md

      gioroddev
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables token-efficient web page fetching by converting HTML to Markdown with tiered access (outline, section, search) to minimize LLM context usage.
      7 npm
      Apache 2.0

    • wasp-mcp

      sfeeney1897
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A Model Context Protocol server that lets Claude query arbitrary webpages with token-efficient, structure-aware retrieval, reducing token costs by fetching only relevant sections.
      3
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A3.6/5.0

    Scored across 2 tools

    Disambiguation2/5

    The two tools are nearly identical: slim_fetch_with_options is explicitly described as the same as slim_fetch but with additional options, making the boundary between them unclear. An agent could use either in most cases, and might not know which one to select without reading the fine print.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Both tool names share the consistent 'slim_fetch' prefix, with the second adding '_with_options' as a descriptive suffix. This follows a predictable pattern, though the second name is slightly more verbose than a strict verb_noun convention.

    Tool Count3/5

    With only 2 tools, the server feels thin for a general-purpose fetch tool. The count is borderline but acceptable for a narrow utility that does one thing well, though it could benefit from a separate tool for raw HTML or batch fetching.

    Completeness4/5

    For its stated purpose of fetching web content in SLIM format, the two tools cover the core functionality: basic fetch and fetch with advanced controls. Minor gaps include lack of explicit support for custom headers or authentication, but these are likely handled through the options parameter.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources