daisyui_get_examples

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, so description must disclose behavioral traits. It states it 'Returns TSX/JSX snippets', which is a read operation. However, it doesn't mention error behavior (e.g., if component not found) or any side effects. Adequate but minimal.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

A single sentence that conveys purpose and return type without redundancy. Every word is meaningful; no extraneous details.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple getter tool with one parameter and no output schema, the description adequately states what it returns (TSX/JSX snippets). It is complete enough for an agent to understand the tool's purpose, though missing details on edge cases or availability of examples.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100% for the single parameter 'name' (described as 'Component name'). The tool description adds that the component is a 'daisyUI React component' but doesn't clarify expected format or provide examples beyond the schema. Baseline 3 applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description clearly states the tool retrieves code examples for a specific daisyUI React component, returning TSX/JSX snippets. This distinguishes it from siblings like daisyui_get_component (likely getting component info) and daisyui_search.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage when wanting code snippets for a specific component, but lacks explicit guidance on when to prefer this tool over siblings like daisyui_search or daisyui_list_components. No when-not-to-use or alternative mentions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.