Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to sas-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables LLMs to work with local Python environments by listing environments and installed packages, installing dependencies, and running code or scripts. Also supports reading, writing, and listing files within a sandboxed working directory.
      -
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables LLMs to run Python code and scripts across available environments, manage packages, and read/write files within a secured working directory. It also provides prompts and resources for common Python development tasks.
      -
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables LLMs to manage Python environments and packages, execute Python code or scripts, and read or write files within a secured working directory. It also provides prompts for common Python tasks such as function creation, refactoring, and debugging.
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Connects AI agents to a local Stata installation so they can run Stata commands and .do files, inspect datasets and codebooks, export graphs, look up help, and verify stored r()/e() results with structured error reporting.
      AGPL 3.0

    TDQS

    A4/5.0

    Scored across 16 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools target a distinct resource and action: config selection, code execution, dataset metadata, file transfer, and comparison. A few overlapping boundaries exist—session_status overlaps with list_libraries/list_datasets for a quick overview, and run_sas vs. run_sas_tests both submit code—but the descriptions make the intended use clear.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    The majority follow a clear verb_noun pattern such as list_datasets, describe_dataset, compare_datasets, and download_from_sas. The exceptions are session_status and sas_doctor, which are noun-led and break the otherwise predictable scheme.

    Tool Count4/5

    Sixteen tools is slightly above the typical 3–15 sweet spot, but each tool maps to a distinct part of the SAS workflow: connection management, session state, code execution, file transfer, metadata inspection, and validation. The count feels justified rather than bloated.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers the core SAS lifecycle well: configure/connect, inspect session and datasets, run code, retrieve logs, transfer files, compare tables, and run tests. Minor gaps exist—no explicit disconnect tool or direct file deletion—but these do not create dead ends since run_sas and session management cover most of them.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo issues