Skip to main content
Glama
matious89pl

umami-analytics-mcp

by matious89pl

Goals report

report_goals
Read-only

Report progress toward custom goals by specifying event, path, or URL conditions. Returns conversion metrics for the given website and time period.

Instructions

Progress toward one or more goals. Each goal is { type: 'event' | 'path', value }. Computed per goal against Umami's /reports/goal endpoint.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
osNo
tagNo
urlNo
cityNo
hostNo
endAtNoExplicit end — ISO 8601, YYYY-MM-DD, or epoch milliseconds. Defaults to now.
eventNo
goalsYesGoal definitions, e.g. { type: 'event', value: 'export_completed' }.
queryNo
rangeNoRelative window: "24h", "7d", "30d", "12w", "today", "yesterday", "this-week", "last-month", "this-year". Ignored when startAt/endAt are set. Default "7d".
titleNo
deviceNo
regionNo
browserNo
countryNo
startAtNoExplicit start — ISO 8601, YYYY-MM-DD, or epoch milliseconds. Overrides range.
languageNo
referrerNo
websiteIdYesUmami website UUID (obtain from list_websites).

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
dataYes
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations declare readOnlyHint=true; description adds the endpoint path but no additional behavioral traits like rate limits or required permissions. No contradiction, but minimal value beyond annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences, front-loaded with purpose, no redundancy. Efficient and easy to scan.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With 19 parameters and many optional filters, the description omits filtering behavior, date range interplay, and output schema usage. Lacks depth for a complex tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters2/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is low (26%); description only explains the goals parameter structure. Many filtering parameters (os, url, etc.) remain undocumented, not compensated by description.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool reports progress on goals, specifies the goal structure (type, value), and references the Umami endpoint, distinguishing it from siblings like report_breakdown or report_funnel.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool vs alternatives like report_breakdown, report_funnel, or get_metrics. The description does not mention prerequisites or exclusion criteria.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/matious89pl/umami-analytics-mcp'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server