Skip to main content
Glama
matheus-rech

Cochrane Meta-Analysis MCP Server

by matheus-rech

Related Servers

Alternatives to Cochrane Meta-Analysis MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables an AI assistant to run systematic review screening steps such as creating projects, importing records, scoring and ranking them with a zero-shot LLM classifier, presenting records for human decisions, applying a statistical stopping criterion, and exporting results. Human reviewers retain responsibility for inclusion decisions, with probabilities hidden unless requested.
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI-native statistical analysis and reproducible research workflows through MCP, including natural language planning, protocol-based analysis, Python/R cross-validation, and publication-ready figure generation.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Turns the Cochrane Library into a tool for AI agents to search and retrieve clinical evidence, including systematic reviews, trials, and plain-language summaries.
      19 npm
      1
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to search registered systematic review protocols, look up individual CRD records, explore the MeSH vocabulary, check for possibly duplicate/overlapping reviews, and export results in RIS format.
      -
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables auditing scientific papers for methodological biases such as selection bias and p-hacking, and assessing citation credibility and research consensus.
      8
      -

    TDQS

    A3.7/5.0

    Scored across 6 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct stage in the meta-analysis workflow: import, validate, analyze, visualize, bias assessment, and report generation. No overlap or ambiguity between tool purposes.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun snake_case pattern (import_, validate_, perform_, generate_, assess_, generate_). The pattern is uniform and predictable.

    Tool Count5/5

    Six tools cover the essential steps of a Cochrane meta-analysis pipeline without being excessive. Each tool serves a clear and necessary role, making the set well-scoped.

    Completeness4/5

    The toolset covers the core workflow from data import to report generation. Minor gaps exist (e.g., sensitivity analysis, subgroup analysis, data export), but the primary domain is well represented.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues