Skip to main content
Glama
matharrismma

Concordance

by matharrismma
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to Concordance

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • riposte

      SorenSocordia
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables deterministic verification of AI agent decisions and actions, providing PASS/FAIL/ABSTAIN verdicts with replayable proofs and an optional signed receipt ledger.
      5 npm
      Apache 2.0

    • APEX PSI MCP Server

      kawal393
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Provides cryptographic truth infrastructure for AI agents, enabling them to seal content with SHA-256 and Ed25519, verify receipts, anchor them to Bitcoin via OpenTimestamps, generate citations, and audit chains of receipts.
      5
      59 npm
      1
      MIT
    • agent-evidence-mcp by probityai

      agent-evidence-mcpofficial

      probityai
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables an assistant to verify whether claims about AI systems hold against supplied evidence bytes, replay conformance vectors, and inspect related terms and artifact digests offline without fetching, writing, or sending data.
      9
      Apache 2.0

    • mcp-redline

      robrobgr
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables language models to verify claims against a local document corpus by returning a literal supporting quote, a contradiction, or an explicit refusal when evidence is insufficient. Runs deterministically offline over local sources without network access or LLM calls.
      4
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    C2.6/5.0

    Scored across 102 tools

    Disambiguation3/5

    Most tools target a distinct resource, and the unusually verbose descriptions do a lot of disambiguation work. But several genuinely confusable clusters remain: verify vs. audit vs. discern vs. kernel_gate, seal_fetch vs. candidate_get, attest_record vs. witness_profession vs. witnesses, and search vs. locate vs. study_find vs. cards_browse. An agent will misselect within these families without re-reading the long descriptions.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    There is a recognizable family-prefix convention (coach_*, mesh_*, group_*, shelf_*, playbook_*, candidate_*, steward_*) mostly in snake_case. However, ordering flips between noun_verb (cards_browse, badges_issue, group_create) and verb_noun (read_passage, verify, curate), and a large set of bare single-word names (kernel, harmony, canon, seeds, decks, witnesses, profession) breaks any predictable pattern.

    Tool Count1/5

    102 tools is an extreme mismatch for any single server surface, spanning verification, Bible reference, community/mesh, sovereign identity, coaching, and budgeting. Many tools are thin single-purpose steps (signable/submit pairs) that inflate the count well beyond what an agent can hold in context.

    Completeness3/5

    The Bible-study surface is remarkably thorough (read, word study, cross-refs, harmony, atlas, canon, narratives, commentary, index), and verification/community flows are covered. But the surface is read-heavy and append-only: there is no delete/update for studies or cards, no group_leave, and no removal path for most created objects, leaving notable lifecycle gaps across the sprawling domains.

    Maintenance

    ActivityActive
    ResponsivenessResponsive

    Resources