us-eli-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to us-eli-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityFmaintenanceAn MCP server for the Congress.gov API that consolidates 91 operations into 6 comprehensive legislative tools that can be used by any MCP client (i.e. Claude Desktop), or MCP-compatible AI agent, to query and reason about congressional data.4 npm1JavaScriptMIT
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceThe open Congress.gov MCP server. Provides comprehensive access to the Congress.gov API through 6 organized toolsets, enabling AI systems to retrieve and interact with legislative data from the United States Congress with a clean, unified interface.24112 PyPI32Sustainable Use v1.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables querying U.S. legislative data from Congress.gov API using MCP resources for direct lookups and tools for searching and retrieving related data.8MIT
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceMCP server for the Brazilian Chamber of Deputies open-data API, enabling search and retrieval of federal legislative bills and their status.151Apache 2.0
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceRemote MCP server for nonpartisan U.S. Congress data: plain-language bill decodes (bilingual EN/ES), representative lookup by ZIP with district-office phones, and what's-moving urgency ranking. Read-only, keyless.51AGPL 3.0
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceThis MCP server enables interaction with the Open States API, allowing users to access legislative data from US state governments through natural language commands.-
TDQS
Scored across 11 tools
Each tool targets a distinct legal source and action: bills, code packages, Federal Register, case law, CFR sections, and a coverage tool. The search/get pairs are clearly separated by resource type, and even similar regulatory sources (Federal Register vs CFR) are distinct.
All tools follow the 'us_' prefix with a verb_noun pattern (search_, get_, list_). The only outlier is 'us_coverage', which uses a noun instead of verb_noun, and 'get_case' is shorter than 'get_federal_register_doc', but overall the pattern is consistent and predictable.
11 tools is well-scoped for a legal research connector covering multiple sources. Each tool serves a clear purpose, and the count is within the ideal 3-15 range, not feeling bloated or sparse.
The server provides search and retrieval for each major legal source: bills, code packages, Federal Register, case law, and CFR. The coverage tool explicitly identifies gaps and fallbacks, which mitigates incompleteness. Minor missing operations like a direct 'get CFR section' tool are workable through search and history tools.