sg-eli-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to sg-eli-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceMCP server for the Laws of Malaysia Online portal, fetching and citing Malaysian principal Acts with verifiable citations.336 PyPIApache 2.0
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceMCP server for Australia's Federal Register of Legislation. Enables searching and fetching Commonwealth Acts with verifiable citations.371 PyPIApache 2.0
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceAn MCP server that indexes Singapore Government GCC documentation and exposes search tools for AI assistants.-
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceMCP server for the Federal Register of Legislation, enabling point-in-time searches, retrieval, and verification of Australian Commonwealth law, including citation checking.867 npm3MIT
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceAn MCP server that provides access to the Irish Statute Book, enabling retrieval of metadata and full enacted text for Irish acts and statutory instruments by year, number, and type, with verifiable ELI identifiers and citations.31Apache 2.0
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceA stateless MCP server for Hong Kong legal research, offering tools to analyze legal intent, search official HKeL statutes, fetch current law metadata, and check source status.-
TDQS
Scored across 4 tools
Each tool targets a distinct action: listing acts, retrieving a single provision, retrieving full act text, and exposing connector coverage. There is no meaningful overlap that would cause an agent to select the wrong tool.
Three tools follow a consistent sg_<verb>_<noun> pattern: sg_list_acts, sg_get_provision, and sg_get_full_text. The outlier is sg_coverage, which uses a bare noun instead of a verb_noun form, but the naming remains predictable overall.
Four tools is a well-scoped size for a focused read-only legal retrieval connector. Each tool covers a distinct core need, and there are no redundant or unnecessary additions.
The set covers listing acts, fetching full text, and fetching individual provisions, with an explicit coverage tool that documents known gaps and fallbacks. It lacks a section index and paginated full-text continuation for large acts, but those gaps are surfaced rather than hidden.