Skip to main content
Glama

nl_get_text

Read-onlyIdempotent

Retrieve the full consolidated XML of a Dutch act in force on a specified date using its BWB identifier.

Instructions

Fetch the full consolidated XML of a Dutch act in force on a date.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
bwb_idYese.g. ``"BWBR0005537"``.
on_dateNooptional ``YYYY-MM-DD``; defaults to today.

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
bwb_idYes
formatNobwb-toestand-xml
contentNo
eli_uriNo
on_dateYes
text_urlNo
byte_sizeNo
source_urlNo
dataset_noteNoBWB (Basiswettenbestand) is the official consolidated body of Dutch national legislation, served by KOOP over SRU. Each act is identified by a BWB id (e.g. BWBR0005537) and has many time-stamped versions (toestanden); tools default to the version in force on a given date (today unless on_date is set). The Netherlands does NOT publish native ELI (/eli/) URIs on consolidated BWB - eli_uri carries the official persistent identifier (the wetten.overheid.nl/id toestand URI). This MVP covers consolidated legislation; case law is exposed separately via the Rechtspraak tools.
version_dateNo
human_readable_citationNo
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already indicate read-only and idempotent behavior. The description adds context about the return format (XML) and date filtering, but does not disclose potential pagination or size limits. No contradictions.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Single sentence with no redundancy. Efficiently conveys the tool's purpose and constraints.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given rich annotations, output schema presence, and simple parameters, the description provides sufficient context for correct use without missing critical details.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100% with clear parameter descriptions (bwb_id example, on_date format and default). The description adds no extra meaning beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states it fetches the full consolidated XML of a Dutch act, specifying scope (in force on a date) and distinguishing it from sibling tools like nl_get_act which may return different formats.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as nl_get_act or nl_search. The description implies usage for fetching XML data but does not exclude other use cases.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/matematicsolutions/nl-eli-mcp'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server