Skip to main content
Glama

Server Configuration

Describes the environment variables required to run the server.

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Instructions

Guidance the server publishes about itself, which clients place ahead of the tool catalog so the model reads it before choosing anything.

This server publishes no instructions, or was last inspected before Glama recorded them.

Capabilities

Features and capabilities supported by this server

Protocol revision2025-11-25

CapabilityDetails
tools
{}

Tools

Functions exposed to the LLM to take actions

NameDescription
searchA

Przeszukuje baze orzeczen sadow polskich w SAOS (System Analizy Orzeczen Sadowych). Pokrycie obejmuje takze orzeczenia biezace (lata 2024-2026 sa dobrze reprezentowane), ale jest nierowne wg typu sadu. Sady administracyjne (WSA/NSA) NIE sa indeksowane. Daty bywaja znieksztalcone przez OCR - weryfikuj sygnature i date w zrodle. Przydatny do: analizy linii orzeczniczej, precedensow, wyszukiwania po tresci / sygnatuze / sedzim / podstawie prawnej. Bledy: invalid_court_type (zly enum), upstream_error (HTTP/timeout API).

get_judgmentA

Pobiera pelne orzeczenie z SAOS po jego numerycznym ID. Zwraca metadane (sygnatura, sad, data, sklad, podstawy prawne), streszczenie (jesli dostepne) oraz pierwsze 2000 znakow tresci. ID orzeczenia pochodzi z wynikow narzedzia 'search' lub 'search_by_case'. Bledy: missing_arg (brak id), not_found (id poza baza), upstream_error.

search_by_caseA

Skrot: szuka orzeczenia po sygnaturze akt (np. 'I ACa 772/13', 'IV CSK 123/15', 'KIO/UZP 100/12'). Odpowiednik search z parametrem caseNumber. Jesli sygnatura nie znajdzie sie w SAOS, sprawa moze byc z sadu administracyjnego (WSA/NSA - nieindeksowane) lub jeszcze nieopublikowana w bazie. Bledy: missing_arg (brak caseNumber), upstream_error.

Prompts

Interactive templates invoked by user choice

NameDescription

No prompts

Resources

Contextual data attached and managed by the client

NameDescription

No resources

TDQS

A4.3/5.0

Scored across 3 tools

Disambiguation5/5

Each tool targets a distinct operation: retrieving a judgment by ID, general search, and search by case number. There is no overlap in functionality.

Naming Consistency4/5

Tool names mostly follow a verb_noun or verb_preposition_noun pattern, but 'search' is just a verb while 'get_judgment' uses get. However, 'search_by_case' is descriptive and consistent with 'search'.

Tool Count5/5

Three tools are appropriate for a focused database query server. Each tool serves a clear purpose without redundancy.

Completeness3/5

Core operations (search and retrieve) are present, but there are gaps: no pagination for search results, and full judgment text is limited to 2000 characters. Missing features like listing courts or fetching full text could hinder some workflows.

Maintenance

ActivityStale
ResponsivenessNo issues