mcp-eu-compliance
Related Servers
Alternatives to mcp-eu-compliance
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceRAG document search MCP server that allows AI assistants to search a local document set and retrieve grounded passages via keyword (SQLite FTS5) or semantic (Chroma) backends.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceMCP server that grounds AI answers in a local, maintained knowledge base and optionally fills gaps from the web, fully local with SQLite.AGPL 3.0
- FlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceLocal-first, read-only MCP server for retrieving and searching authorised CCSDS and ECSS standards, enabling citation-rich passage-level search and document access.3-
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceLocal-first RAG indexing and semantic search MCP server. Enables document retrieval and context-aware queries using local embedding models.36 npmMIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceMCP server for local knowledge management with Markdown and PDF indexing using SQLite FTS5.59 npm2MIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceMCP server for managing and searching multi-tenant knowledge bases backed by SQLite with FTS5, enabling AI agents to persist and retrieve content via full-text search.132MIT
TDQS
Scored across 5 tools
Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: eu_article retrieves a specific article by ID, eu_check_applicability determines which regulations apply to a sector, eu_compare compares topics across regulations, eu_evidence provides audit evidence, and eu_search performs full-text search. There is no ambiguity between them.
All tools use the 'eu_' prefix, but the second part mixes verb and noun forms (e.g., eu_article vs eu_check_applicability). While readable and predictable, the pattern is not perfectly consistent, which lowers the score slightly.
With 5 tools, the server is well-scoped for its purpose of querying EU compliance regulations. Each tool provides essential functionality without redundancy or unnecessary bloat.
The tool set covers key operations: retrieving articles, checking applicability, comparing regulations, obtaining evidence, and searching. Missing a tool to list all articles by regulation, but that can be approximated via search. Minor gap, but overall coverage is solid.