No user-submitted related servers found.
Scored across 4 tools
hr_get_act and hr_get_text are clearly separated as metadata versus full HTML text, and hr_list_issue handles discovery by gazette issue. hr_coverage is distinct as a meta-tool for gaps. The only minor risk is that hr_get_act and hr_get_text both accept ELI coordinates, but their descriptions resolve the boundary.
Tools share a consistent hr_ prefix and mostly follow a verb_noun pattern: hr_list_issue, hr_get_act, hr_get_text. hr_coverage breaks the pattern by using a noun-only name, though it is still understandable and consistent in style.
Four tools is an appropriate, focused scope for an ELI legal document connector. Each tool performs a distinct retrieval or coverage function, and none feel redundant or missing as a core operation.
The server covers the core workflow: discovering documents by issue, fetching metadata, and retrieving full text. A full-text or title search is absent, but hr_coverage explicitly documents known gaps and fallback sources, which mitigates the limitation.