fi-eli-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to fi-eli-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityFmaintenanceEnables MCP-compatible AI assistants to search and retrieve Finnish statutes and legal provisions, with tools for citation validation, currency checks, and EU law cross-references.1640 npmApache 2.0
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceProvides access to Danish legislation from Retsinformation.dk, enabling retrieval of act metadata, full text, and recent changes with verifiable citations.446 PyPIApache 2.0
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceEnables access to Slovak legislation from the Collection of Laws via static.slov-lex.sk. Supports listing consolidated versions, retrieving act metadata, and fetching full text with verifiable citations.41Apache 2.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables searching the HelMet library catalogue, retrieving full metadata for records, and locating which branches own a title with format and availability-of-collection information via the open Finna API.19,294,395 npmMIT
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceEnables querying Luxembourg legislation metadata and full Akoma Ntoso text via ELI identifiers from Legilux open data.338 PyPI1Apache 2.0
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceEnables AI agents to search and retrieve consolidated Swedish statutes (SFS) from the Riksdagen open data API, with verifiable citations and persistent identifiers.4Apache 2.0
TDQS
Scored across 4 tools
Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: listing statutes by year, fetching metadata, fetching full text, and declaring coverage gaps. There is no overlap or ambiguity between them.
Three tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern (fi_list_acts, fi_get_act, fi_get_text), but fi_coverage is a noun-only name that breaks the pattern. The inconsistency is minor and doesn't cause confusion.
With 4 tools, the server is small but well-scoped for a focused legal data connector. The count is slightly below the typical range but each tool serves a necessary function in retrieval and transparent coverage reporting.
The tool surface covers core read operations (list, get metadata, get text) plus explicit coverage handling, which is a thoughtful safeguard. A keyword search or version history would be a natural addition but its absence is not a critical gap for the apparent purpose.