Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to es-eli-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      F
      maintenance
      MCP server for querying Spanish government open data APIs including grants, legislation, company registry, statistics, and open data catalog. Enables LLMs to access Spanish public information on-the-fly.
      26
      5
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      F
      maintenance
      Enables querying Spanish legislation (BOE) and EU law integration through MCP, providing full-text search, citation validation, and cross-referencing capabilities.
      47 npm
      2
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      MCP server for Spain's official BOE auction portal: search judicial foreclosures, notarial and tax-agency auctions, get consolidated per-auction detail (assets, lots, bids, authority contacts) and computed legal thresholds (art. 671 LEC). Clean JSON, GDPR-safe, no headless browser.
      2
      AGPL 3.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A community-maintained MCP server that simplifies access to EU legal and legislative data from the CELLAR service, supporting lookups, metadata retrieval, relation checks, and monitoring.
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server for accessing Uruguay's IMPO open data API with SQLite caching. Provides tools to retrieve legal norms, search regulations, and access schema documentation from Uruguay's official legal database.
      4
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      MCP server for the Brazilian Chamber of Deputies open-data API, enabling search and retrieval of federal legislative bills and their status.
      15
      42 PyPI
      1
      Apache 2.0

    TDQS

    A4/5.0

    Scored across 13 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools follow a clear search/get pair per legal source, but es_get_act and es_get_text could be momentarily confused (metadata vs. full text). Overall each tool targets a distinct resource/action, so mis-selection risk is low.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tools share the es_ prefix and use a consistent verb_resource structure (es_get_*, es_search_*, es_browse_gazette, es_coverage). The naming pattern is uniform across all 13 tools.

    Tool Count5/5

    13 tools is well-scoped for a multi-source legal connector covering BOE, TC, DGT, TEAC, and AEPD. Each tool earns its place and the count is neither thin nor bloated.

    Completeness4/5

    Each legal domain has both a search/resolution and a fetch tool, and BOE laws have metadata/index/text retrieval. Minor gaps like no free-text law search or direct gazette document fetch exist but are workable via browse and coverage fallbacks.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues