Skip to main content
Glama
matematicsolutions

de-eli-mcp

by matematicsolutions
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to de-eli-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • German Law MCP

      JustiziusAI
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Provides LLM-friendly access to German federal legislation via the NeuRIS API, enabling tool-based retrieval of laws, norms, and statutory text.
      14 npm
      MIT

    • Rechtsinformationen Bund DE

      wolfgangihloff
      F
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Provides access to the official German Federal Legal Information Portal (rechtsinformationen.bund.de) enabling AI agents to search German federal laws, court decisions, and legal documentation with authoritative citations from official sources.
      5
      23
      -

    • German Law MCP

      Movm
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Provides read-only access to current German federal law, supporting legislation search, provision retrieval, and citation handling.
      Apache 2.0

    • German Legal MCP Server

      metaneutrons
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Provides unified access to German federal and state legislation, court decisions, and European Union legal databases for comprehensive legal research. It enables users to search and retrieve full-text laws, parliamentary documents, and judicial rulings directly through the Model Context Protocol.
      20
      244 npm
      GPL 3.0
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A3.8/5.0

    Scored across 15 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Tools are mostly distinct by domain and source (legislation, NeuRIS case law, RII, Open Legal Data, DIP, coverage), and descriptions clearly flag source differences. Some ambiguity remains between the multiple court-decision search and full-text retrieval tools, though the prefixes help agents pick correctly.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    The de_ prefix and snake_case convention are consistent, and most tools follow an action/object or source/action/object pattern. Deviations like de_recent_changes and de_coverage are noun-style rather than verb-style, causing minor inconsistency.

    Tool Count4/5

    Fifteen tools is at the upper edge of the ideal range but justifiable for a multi-source legal data connector covering legislation, federal case law via three providers, parliamentary documents, and coverage metadata. A few case-law tools could arguably be consolidated, but none feel redundant.

    Completeness5/5

    The set covers the major read-only workflows for German legal research: search and retrieve legislation, search and retrieve case law from multiple complementary sources, monitor recent changes, query parliamentary documents, and fetch individual documents. The explicit de_coverage tool also addresses known data gaps, making the surface unusually complete for its stated purpose.

    Maintenance

    ActivityActive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources