br-eli-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to br-eli-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server that provides access to the Brazilian Chamber of Deputies open data API. It enables users to search for deputies, track their expenses, and query legislative information such as bills and API endpoints.61MIT
- AlicenseBqualityFmaintenanceMCP server for Brazilian Federal Senate open data (legislators, bills, votes, committees)33211 npmMIT
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceMCP server for the Congress.gov API that tracks US federal legislative process, providing tools to search bills and get bill details.1138 PyPI1Apache 2.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceMCP server for querying Brazil's public transparency portal, providing read-only access to government spending and public data.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceMCP server for querying Brazil's CNJ DataJud public API. Enables validating CNJ process numbers, searching lawsuits by number, and listing courts.MIT
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceMCP server for Brazilian Federal Senate open data — 90 tools covering the legislative process, Senate administration, and citizen participation. Hosted on Cloudflare Workers (Streamable HTTP), no authentication required. Tool names and responses are in Portuguese (pt-BR), matching the official Senate data.69211 npm6MIT
TDQS
Scored across 15 tools
Each tool targets a distinct court or legal resource, with clear search/get pairs separated by entity type. Even similar tools like br_search_processos and br_search_case_stj are explicitly disambiguated as metadata-only versus full ruling text.
The br_search_* and br_get_* verb_noun pattern is consistently applied across courts, processes, proposicoes, and normas. The only real deviation is br_coverage, which is a noun-only command rather than a verb-led action.
15 tools is well-scoped for a Brazilian legal research connector spanning multiple courts and legislative sources. Each tool has a distinct responsibility, and the count matches the breadth of the domain without redundancy.
Core search-and-retrieve workflows are covered for TCU, STJ, TST, DataJud processos, proposicoes, and normas. CARF has no free-text search and STF jurisprudence is absent, but the explicit br_coverage tool documents these gaps and provides fallbacks, so agents are not left with silent dead ends.