Skip to main content
Glama
matematicsolutions

au-eli-mcp

by matematicsolutions
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to au-eli-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • sg-eli-mcp

      matematicsolutions
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      An MCP server for Singapore Statutes Online (SSO), the official portal for Singapore legislation. It browses, fetches, and cites Acts, with a verifiable citation on every response.
      4
      35 PyPI
      3
      Apache 2.0

    • tr-eli-mcp

      matematicsolutions
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      An MCP server for accessing Turkish legislation (laws, regulations, decrees) via the Adalet Bakanligi API, providing search, full-text retrieval, and structured citations.
      5
      147 PyPI
      1
      Apache 2.0

    • ris-mcp

      noahpfi
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server that exposes Austrian federal law (Bundesrecht) to LLMs, enabling full-text search, paragraph retrieval, historical versions, statute lookup, BGBl lookups, amendment timelines, and citation searches via the public RIS OGD API.
      -
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A4/5.0

    Scored across 3 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clearly distinct role: searching by title, fetching full text by FRLI identifier, and reporting coverage/gaps. There is no functional overlap between the tools.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    The au_ prefix is consistent, and two tools follow the verb_noun pattern (search_acts, get_text). However, au_coverage breaks the pattern by being a bare noun rather than an action-oriented name, creating a minor inconsistency.

    Tool Count4/5

    Three tools is on the lean side but appropriate for a narrowly scoped legal research connector: search, retrieve, and coverage awareness. The count feels intentional rather than sparse.

    Completeness4/5

    The core workflow of searching and retrieving Act text is covered, and the explicit coverage tool acknowledges known gaps with fallbacks. Missing features like browsing all acts or version history are not clearly required for the stated purpose.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources