Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to mateai-youtube

Related Servers

  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    A local, privacy-first MCP server providing direct access to official YouTube Data, Analytics, Reporting, and Live Streaming APIs for creators, enabling channel analysis, research, and guarded management operations.
    3
    MIT
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    Enables users to open and customize a self-hosted YouTube analytics workbench with channel overviews, trends, video performance, audience sources, retention reports, CSV/JSON exports, themes, and layouts using locally authorized data. It also supports MCP Apps panels and tools for opening the dashboard from compatible clients.
    MIT
  • A
    license
    B
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    Local read-only MCP server for YouTube Data API v3 and YouTube Analytics API, enabling public video searches and OAuth-based private channel reads.
    9
    MIT
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    Enables authenticated MCP clients to research public YouTube channels and videos, read owner-authorized analytics reports, and draft, version and locally export original production blueprints. It runs locally with Docker Compose and PostgreSQL, providing eighteen tools with provenance, quota accounting, and governed analytics that return blocked responses when data or permission is missing.
    MIT
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    A local, read-only MCP server that provides Claude with private YouTube Analytics data—views, retention, traffic sources, demographics, revenue, and impressions/CTR—via authenticated Google APIs.
    7 npm
    MIT
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    Enables MCP clients to manage multiple named YouTube accounts through one local stdio server, covering video upload and scheduling, metadata, captions, playlists, comments, live broadcasts and chat, channel branding, and analytics reporting via the official Google APIs. It also offers optional FFmpeg-based local media tools for probing, muxing audio, normalizing loudness, trimming, burning subtitles, and extracting thumbnails.
    MIT

TDQS

A4/5.0

Scored across 15 tools

Disambiguation4/5

Most tools target a distinct resource+action (list_comments vs post_comment vs reply_comment, upload vs update vs delete video), and descriptions clarify boundaries well. Some overlap remains: yt_channel_snapshot already returns recent videos and Shorts metrics, blurring against yt_list_videos and yt_shorts_experiment_table, and the two table tools (cross_platform_shorts_table vs yt_shorts_experiment_table) could be confused at a glance despite the TikTok pairing distinction.

Naming Consistency4/5

Almost all YouTube tools share the yt_ prefix with verb_noun or noun_noun forms, and TikTok tools use tiktok_ consistently, which is a readable platform-based convention. Deviations: cross_platform_shorts_table has no prefix and is noun-first, and the two *_table tools break the action-verb pattern used elsewhere.

Tool Count5/5

15 tools is squarely within a well-scoped range, and each covers a distinct task in the creator workflow (upload, update, delete, comments, analytics snapshots, safety settings, cross-platform comparison). No tool feels redundant or filler.

Completeness4/5

Core lifecycle is covered: upload/update/delete videos, list uploads, list/post/reply to comments, video details, channel snapshot, and safety controls. Gaps exist—no comment deletion/moderation, limited reply retrieval (only first few replies), and no playlist or cross-video search beyond local title matching, but none block the main publishing and analytics workflows.

Maintenance

ActivityMaintained
ResponsivenessNo issues