Skip to main content
Glama
Bilibili Video Info MCP

Bilibili Video Info MCP

by masx200

Related Servers

Alternatives to Bilibili Video Info MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables retrieval of comments from Bilibili videos and dynamic posts with support for pagination, sorting, and nested replies in both Markdown and JSON formats.
      2
      4 npm
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables Claude Desktop, Cursor, and other AI clients to fetch Bilibili video metadata, popular comments, and subtitles directly from public web endpoints without an API key.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables tracking and exploring Bilibili users, videos, dynamics, articles, followings, and comment threads through Bilibili's public web API, with optional subtitle retrieval and cookie-based access.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI coding agents to access Bilibili video data and turn videos into notes, including search, video info, subtitles, chapters, audio download, ASR transcription, comments, uploader collections, and favorites.
      15
      2
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.7/5.0

    Scored across 3 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose targeting different aspects of video content: comments, danmaku (bullet comments), and subtitles. There is no overlap in functionality, and the descriptions make it easy to differentiate between these three types of video metadata.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tools follow a consistent 'get_noun' pattern (get_comments, get_danmaku, get_subtitles) using snake_case throughout. This predictable naming convention makes it easy for agents to understand what each tool does based on its name alone.

    Tool Count3/5

    With only 3 tools, the server feels somewhat thin for a video information domain. While the tools cover specific metadata types well, there are likely other relevant operations (like getting video details, statistics, or user info) that would make the surface more complete for typical video analysis workflows.

    Completeness2/5

    The toolset has significant gaps for a video information server. There's no way to get basic video metadata (title, description, duration, uploader), statistics (views, likes, shares), or user information. While the three tools provide specific content types, they don't cover the fundamental video information that would typically be needed first in most workflows.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessSyncing