Obtain the current version of the MasterGo Magic MCP server for compatibility checks with your AI model integration.
the current version is 0.2.2
This tool declares no required parameters. Add optional parameters from the input schema as needed.
{
"id": 1,
"jsonrpc": "2.0",
"method": "tools/call",
"params": {
"arguments": {},
"name": "version_0_2_2"
}
}| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.
v1.0.1Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are present, and the description does not disclose behavior beyond stating the version. It fails to mention that this is a read-only operation or how the information is obtained.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is extremely brief (a single fragment) but not well-structured. It lacks a full sentence explaining the tool's purpose. It cannot be considered concise as defined; it is underspecified.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the simplicity of the tool (no parameters, no output schema), the description should at least indicate that this tool returns the current version. The absence of such context makes it incomplete for an agent to understand its purpose.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The input schema has no parameters, so schema coverage is 100%. The description does not add meaning beyond the schema, but given zero parameters, no additional parameter information is necessary.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description states 'the current version is 0.2.2' which is a statement of fact rather than describing tool functionality. It does not clarify that the tool returns or retrieves version information. The name 'version_0_2_2' could be misinterpreted as a static constant.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool. Siblings like getMeta and getDsl suggest other ways to obtain metadata, but no exclusions or contextual advice are provided.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.